Energy Developer

It’s not yesterday’s mega-project construction; it’s a paradigm shift to unlock the true potential of nuclear power.

clear accountability

The developer serves as temporary project owner and single point of contact--streamlining governance, accelerating decisions and aligning execution across stakeholders

cross-project learning

By integrating lessons from multiple deployments and aggregating supply chain activity, the developer reduces costs, schedule risk and rework.

specialized megaproject expertise

With deep infrastructure experience, the developer supplies tools, processes and teams purpose-built to control costs, manage risk and maintain schedule discipline.

Why Solestiss for your project development?

Delivery Expertise

Decades of mega project leadership in nuclear and capital-intensive infrastructure

  • 35 GWs of nuclear technology delivery, including 15 GW FOAK projects
  • Constructability-Driven Execution Planning
  • Proven cost and schedule risk identification process, analytic tools, and mitigation strategies

Financing Access

Network of private sector partnerships and public sector relationships to facilitate upfront capital and premium-priced PPAs, minimizing project owner balance sheet needs

  • Data center customers and component suppliers
  • AI developers
  • Private equity funds

Technology Fluency

In-depth experience with multiple OEM design teams

  • Ability to unlock schedule and cost efficiencies through multiple unit deployment synergies and lessons learned
  • Deep understanding of supply chain needs
  • Technology agnostic

Time to Market

Preferred access to approximately 8GW of natural gas plants to meet near-term data center demand and serve as long-term or bridge power before nuclear project completion

  • Natural gas plants deployable in ~2 years
  • Industry leading steam and combustion turbines
  • Gas supply options available in some regions

Regulatory Leadership

Former NRC officials, top legal advisors, and licensing strategists offering a clear roadmap to regulatory approvals

  • Pre-application strategy
  • Licensing planning
  • NRC engagement submission
  • DOE engagement strategy
  • Review and approval oversight
  • Engagement with states leading nuclear advancement

Large Reactors vs SMRs

Modern larger reactors, such as the AP1000, and Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) represent compelling advancements in addressing contemporary energy demands, with a strong focus on efficiency, safety, and sustainability.

The AP1000, recognized for its substantial power output of over 1000 MW, is particularly well-suited for supplying large-scale energy grids and has a demonstrated track record of successful operation. In contrast, SMRs offer a modular and adaptable approach, positioning them as excellent options for localized energy needs and projects that benefit from incremental deployment. Their standardized designs also contribute to potentially faster licensing and construction processes.
‍
Both the AP1000 and SMRs incorporate distinct safety measures tailored to their designs. In terms of sustainability, SMRs generally require fewer resources and have a smaller environmental footprint, while the AP1000 provides dependable long-term energy security for extensive grid systems. Ultimately, the decision between these technologies will depend on the specific objectives, timelines, and energy demands of a given project and region.

aboutinsightscontactprivacy policy